Monday, March 23, 2020

Mainstream vs Underground free essay sample

Music has became evident In the culture throughout the world. Delved by the mind of the listener, mainstream music and underground music can be seen as two completely deferent sub groups of music. This can be seen by their popularity, messages that are portrayed, creativity, as well as in their sales and income. Hip hop music developed as a local, underground, alternative to the mainstream with a message which confronted urban poverty, racism, and a growing sense of economic abandonment in Black inner city neighborhoods.Mainstream music is popular commercialese music. If the media makes it popular and well known, it is mainstream. Underground music Is not advertised or represented by the media. However, no one Is better than the other In the sense that there are good music as well as bad music whether mainstream or underground. Mainstream and Underground music contrast in their popularity. Mainstream music can be seen as all about the glamour of the music Industry and portraying the Image that the target audiences would like to see. We will write a custom essay sample on Mainstream vs Underground or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This Image Involves Images and yards about money and its illegal origins, sex and the greed for women who degrade themselves for the limelight, as well as the glorification of the use of illegal drugs and the sales of It. The media has presented music, specifically rap, to be associated with negative connotations of blackness, letting commercialese hip hop become a nearly constant caricature of gangs, pimps, and hoes, weve come to equate black poverty with black street life.Mainstream music is still more censored and does not always focus on content rather than form. It Is another form of slavery In which artists are still forced to watch what Is being said and hold back on. On the other hand, underground music is about the quest for creativity and the artists expression to their fullest potential. Because of the lack of label representation, there is also a lack of restrictions. There is not any censorship. This allows underground artists to be more free with their lyrics and create their own Image rather than following a certain criteria. Underground music is kept real. In opposition, both sub groups of music share the common occupation consisting of artists who love their raft. Because of the different statuses In popularity, mainstream and underground music are also different In their revenue. Mainstream music sells! It Is what Is In the public eye of locals as well as tourists and what society invest their money in through the purchase of CDC, online music downloads, as well as attendance in concerts. Local promoters for the tourist Industry exploit the distinctive aspects of their citys music scene by often changing their artists Image to appeal to outsiders as well. Ratings also contribute to the income of mainstream music. Whether it sounds good r bad, money is continuously being made in the industry. It is promoted by a record I OFF sell at all depending on the artists promotion of their own self. Underground artists are barely advertised to the public for purchase or download.But, underground music artists also hold concerts to appeal to those that do give them recognition and are aware of their unpublished music. Creativity plays a major role in the presentation of music. How you make your music available and appealing to your target audience, has a lot to do with the influence it has on the listener. Underground music displays more creativity in contrast to mainstream music in which most underground artists uses beats that they may have produced and their own lyrics.It gives the artist a better sense of independence when they can put our their own music . There is more originality present because there are no rules to follow. Graffiti is now shunned in mainstream music as well as beat boxing or the making of beats. Underground artists use these mediums as a way to be heard and related to. Underground music also can be learnt from in which it has an impact on people. It may be a voice for the artist as well as the people to potentially make a change, while most mainstream music are so commercial that they tend to sell through their music.

Friday, March 6, 2020

Memory Inconsistencies essays

Memory Inconsistencies essays Memory Inconsistencies 2 Elizabeth Loftus theory of reconstructive memory proposes that when we try and remember an event, we will piece it bit by bit from our memories to reconstruct that event. However, gaps in our memory can distort our recollection of events, and our tendency is to fill in those gaps with our own plausible information, thus creating memories that never really occurred. These ideas imply the high malleability of our own memories, and the likelihood of not being able to accurately discriminate from what is real and what is imagined. With that in mind, does a question influence its answer? Do words enhance or distract our different sensory memories? What do we really remember about certain incidences that occur in our everyday lives? Moreover, does confidence correlate with accuracy? These are a few questions that are highly applicable in the PBS Frontline documentary, What Jennifer Saw. In the documentary, we learn that Jennifer Thompson was attacked and raped by an armed black man, and somehow managed to escape and call for help. During the attack however, Jennifer realized that if she did escape, her only way of identifying her assailant would be by closely remembering his facial features and speech. However, due to the circumstances Jennifer was only able to capture certain characteristics of the assailant and his tone of voice. Would this information be enough to pinpoint her attacker? In Jennifers case it was not. Jennifer was responsible for sending Ronald Cotton, an innocent man, to prison for 11 years. Inevitably, Jennifer wanted to identify her assailant to give herself closure, furthermore, her decisions were based on inconclusive evidence and suggestions made by the police in questioning. This demonstrates the high malleability of our memories because Jennifer was not confident in identifying her attacker. Even with idea...